Additional References: Re: [Comp-neuro] The Neuronal Replicator
Hypothesis
padams at notes.cc.sunysb.edu
padams at notes.cc.sunysb.edu
Sat Oct 23 14:44:28 CEST 2010
Comp-neuro readers of the recently announced Neural Computation paper on
the Neuronal Replicator Hypothesis by Fernando, Goldstein and Szathmary
might be also interested in our related, but quite distinct, work on
Synaptic Darwinism. References to key papers, including those available
freely online, are given below. The papers are also available at our
website syndar.org
The main difference from the Neuronal Replicator idea, and similar work by
Edelman, Changeux etc, is that we propose that synaptic weights
"replicate". This is merely new terminology for standard Hebbian learning
("replication" = "strengthening"), and brings nothing interesting.
However, we add an important novel ingredient, based on the experimental
findings that ltp/ltd is not completely synapse-specific. Such "crosstalk"
between adjustments at different connections introduces a "mutational"
element into standard neural network learning procedures. In particular,
for nonlinear learning rules (such as those used in ICA), qualitative, and
undesirable, changes in learning occur, sometimes even at extremely low,
probably unavoidable, crosstalk levels. We conclude that nontrivial
unsupervised learning might require extraordinarily accurate weight
changes, and speculate that the key feature which allows neocortex to do
such learning is special "Hebbian proofreading" circuitry, analogous to
the machinery underlying accurate DNA replication. This unusual circuitry
might explain many of the more puzzling features of the neocortex.
Paul Adams and Kingsley Cox
Stony Brook University
syndar.org
• Cox K and Adams PR (2009) Hebbian crosstalk prevents
nonlinear unsupervised learning. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 3:1-20 2009
• Radulescu, A., Cox, K., and Adams, P. (2009). Hebbian
errors in learning: an analysis using the Oja model. J. Theor. Biol. 258,
489-501.
• Adams, P and Cox, K. (2006). A neurobiological perspective
on building intelligent devices. The Neuromorphic Engineer 3, 2-10
• Adams, P. and Cox, K. (2002). A new interpretation of
thalamocortical circuitry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 357, 1767-1779.
• Adams,P.R. and Cox, K.J.A. (2002). Synaptic Darwinism and
neocortical function. Neurocomputing 42, 197-214
• Cox, K.J.A. and Adams, P.R. (2000). Implications of
synaptic digitisation and error for neocortical function. Neurocomputing.
32-33, 673-678
• Adams P. (2000) To Sleep, Perchance to Dream. Science
Spectra 23, 46-55
• Adams, P.R (1998). Hebb and Darwin. J. Theoret. Biol. 195
:419-438
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.neuroinf.org/pipermail/comp-neuro/attachments/20101023/cb24b689/attachment.html
More information about the Comp-neuro
mailing list