[Comp-neuro] Re: Attractors, variability and noise
mnegrello at gmail.com
Wed Aug 13 19:49:05 CEST 2008
> As I understand the other end of the spectrum, we construct
> increasingly realistic models and end up with a simulated brain
> without a real understanding of how it works, which makes no sense
> to me. Understanding is what we're after, and that understanding
> can only reside in the brains of the population of scientists, not
> in their models.
That is why shared terminology, a shared conceptual frame, becomes so
crucially important. To the expense that we may have to be extra
tolerant about the usage of certain concepts, specially in agreeing
that they are contrivances of the human mind. I think that einstein
said once (from plato-stanford encyclopedia):
" If you wish to learn from the theoretical physicist anything about
the methods which he uses, I would give you the following piece of
advice: Don't listen to his words, examine his achievements. For to
the discoverer in that field, the constructions of his imagination
appear so necessary and so natural that he is apt to treat them not as
the creations of his thoughts but as given realities."
That is true of physicists, and scientists in general. But against
einstein's admonishment, ' don't listen to his words', one should say,
listen with caution.
More information about the Comp-neuro